When black people in Newark start getting a little too "uppity," it's time to fluff up the pillows on our local punditocracy's fainting coach. Quickly, someone catch the editorialists at the
Star-Ledger - and bring the smelling salts!
Cami Anderson, the superintendent of schools in Newark, has proposed another round of sensible and bold reforms. And she is facing the predictable shrieks of protest from the defenders of the status quo.
Mercy! The "shrieks"!
The link above takes you to an article about Ras Baraka, principal at Central High, on leave as he runs for mayor. Apparently, the
S-L doesn't think Baraka, a veteran of the district, is "reasonable":
Anderson, a former protégé of Joel Klein in New York City, is often criticized for failing to draw more Newark stakeholders into her circle as she hatches these reforms. While there is some truth to that, it’s also true that much of her opposition is shrill and unreasonable.
None of these reforms is guaranteed to succeed. But it is sensible to lean on the best charter schools for help, give principals control over their staffs and make sure each ward has plenty of school choices. If that stirs up a bees nest, then so be it. [emphasis mine]
Hear that, people of Newark? Your local newspaper thinks you're a hive of bees! Worker drones, I imagine...
Luckily for us, Santa brought an early present: a response to this idiotic editorial in the form of a post from former
S-L journalist
Bob Braun:
Those who criticize the plan are “shrill” and they “shriek”–how is that for subtly racist comments? Not unlike calling ambitious women “pushy.” These were elected officials who spoke out Friday–members of the council, a member and the speaker of the New Jersey Assembly. That they were men and women of color, representing a predominantly minority community, doesn’t make their passion “shrill” or “shrieking.” It means they care about the city where few editorial employees live.
How dare a newspaper that has put its Newark property up for sale tell city residents how to live? When is the last time it told the residents of Millburn and Westfield they have enough income and should volunteer to pay higher income taxes? When is the last time it told communities in Somerset and Hunterdon counties that they should change their zoning practices to allow low- and middle-income residents? When is the last time it told Essex County and Union County that they have too many school districts and should consolidate into income-and racially–integrated unified systems?
Ooo, pick me, pick me! The answer:
never.
Read Braun's entire post, which is dead-on. The truth is that the "reforms" Anderson proposes have never worked and will not work. They are, in reality, an abdication of responsibility on the part of the state, which has utterly failed to do its job over the last two decades of state control and provide Newark's beautiful, deserving children with
schools that are worthy of them.
But, of course, if
Baraka or advisory board President
Antoinette Richardson-Baskerville dare to get up and say something so impolite, the
Star-Ledger will instantly label them as "
shrill and unreasonable." And the folks at
PolitickerNJ know what
that sort of thing leads to:
On Friday in Brick City, South Ward Councilman and Newark mayoral candidate Ras Baraka threw a verbal brick through the city's educational policy window. [emphasis mine]
I'm sure it's just one of those odd coincidences that
the writer here chose to start his piece with the image of a black man throwing a brick through a window. Just like it was odd when the
Star-Ledger said the Newark City Council "
...has a long history of crazy behavior." Or when the press had a hissy fit when
Karen Lewis, the Chicago Teachers Union president, quoted Shakespeare and
Alice in Wonderland ("Off with their heads" - yes, I'm sure she's walking around with a guillotine right now...). Or when the media rushed to call a few incidents of the "knockout game" an "
epidemic" on the
basis of no proof. Or when people of color are
overrepresented in the media as violent criminals.
Or when large swaths of the press thought the biggest worry about the Trayvon Martin case was that
black people might start rioting if they didn't like the verdict.
1 comment:
If I hear another school reform advocate, charter school pusher use the repeated and echoed and parroted phrase, "defenders of the status quo" or variations of the same, I will vomit all over central NJ. If you oppose charter schools and school privatization, then you are for the status quo. If you are for unions and bargaining rights, then you are for the status quo, that evil status quo. Geez, the Rheeformers all read from the same script and they repeat it ad nauseam. A couple years ago residents in the Princeton-West Windsor-South Brunswick area were quite upset with the prospect of a Chinese immersion charter school being imposed on their high performing districts. These residents were slimed, scorned and demonized as being for the....drum roll... status quo. They can shove the status quo up their common core curriculum. The critics of Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman described him as being shrill. I guess that is supposed to be the ultimate put down..... a shrill defender of the status quo.
Post a Comment